How solar+storage can help the Los Angeles Community College District avoid diesel generators - Clean Coalition

How solar+storage can help the Los Angeles Community College District avoid diesel generators

The Clean Coalition helped LACCD evaluate renewable-energy alternatives to a polluting diesel generator for a downtown office.

Frank Wasko

The Clean Coalition has completed a feasibility assessment for the Los Angeles Community College District (LACCD) to identify emergency power needs for critical loads and various backup power solutions, including a Solar Microgrid, at the LACCD Educational Services Center (ESC), a high-rise building in downtown Los Angeles.

Our assessment compared the feasibility of a Solar Microgrid to the ESC’s existing diesel-based emergency backup power system. The Clean Coalition conducted stakeholder outreach on business continuity needs within various district departments; completed a thorough code review to ensure code compliance of all designs; defined and analyzed 40 design scenarios spanning various load requirements, outage durations, and generation resources; and performed detailed economic and carbon emission analyses on the most promising configurations.

The following load scenarios were investigated for the final assessment:

A table with several different types of electrical and fire safety information.

Study findings

Building code requirements. LACCD will need to obtain approval from Los Angeles City Building Inspection to utilize a solar PV + battery energy storage system (BESS) or a BESS-only system as an alternative to the incumbent fossil-fuel-based emergency power systems.

Remote work limitations. While LACCD departments are prepared to work remotely during short-term power outages, there is less certainty about long-term power outages due to concerns about the lack of appropriate technologies and processes.

Economics. All scenarios investigated represent a net financial investment rather than a net savings:

  • Solar contribution is limited to about 7% of the site’s annual electricity consumption, because of limited solar siting potential and hampered production efficiency from excessive shading. The limited solar generation capacity means that some energy from the grid will be needed to charge the battery – this, combined with the 85% roundtrip efficiency of typical lithium-ion batteries, limits the battery’s net economic potential for reducing demand charges and performing time-of-use (TOU) arbitrage.
  • The site is ineligible for common incentives, including California’s Self-Generation Incentive Program SGIP and tax benefits.
  • LACCD can’t participate in a power purchase agreement (PPA) due to restrictions on the bond funding available.

A bar graph showing the energy use of solar generation.


LACCD is now considering the Clean Coalition’s recommendations, which are based on both the results of the analyses and consideration of LACCD’s long-term energy and sustainability goals.

A table showing the differences between solar and wind generators.

Option 1: Add PV+BESS to the existing diesel system for Scenario A, with a phased approach. This approach splits the capital investments into two phases, allowing LACCD to meet its immediate emergency power needs with added environmental benefits, learn from a small-scale pilot installation, and pursue Phase 2 when conditions are more favorable.

In Phase 1, a 181 kWp PV system and a 232 kW / 232 kWh BESS system would be installed, and the existing 175 kW diesel would be de-rated to 150 kW so it may run for five more years. PV helps to drive down the overall emissions for this scenario, which are 7.1 % lower than the diesel-only baseline. This scenario includes preparing the site infrastructure for easy installation of additional batteries in two years (up-sizing conduit for larger wires, etc.).

In Phase 2, additional batteries would be installed to reach the full capacity specified in Option 2 (580 kW / 2,320 kWh) within five years. Benefits include taking advantage of falling lithium-ion BESS costs, as well as expected new LADWP TOU periods and rates, which may provide more value for the energy storage in two years. The diesel would be decommissioned once there is adequate battery capacity installed.

A flowchart of the various parts of an electrical system.
LACCD ESC Circuit Flow Diagram with Critical Load Panel (CLP)

Option 2: Install a PV+BESS system for Scenario B. Scenario B represents the largest Total Critical Load Required (TCLR) and is capable of covering the critical load of all the 8-hour scenarios. A 181 kWp PV system and a 580 kW / 2,320 kWh battery would be installed – enabling LACCD to expand its emergency power system, including some business continuity loads, without needing to make additional investments in fossil-fuel-based generation. A PV+BESS configuration is preferred over a BESS-only configuration, because PV is likely to be a prerequisite for eligibility for a future LADWP energy storage incentive.

Option 3: Install a BESS-only system for Scenario A, with a phased approach. A 290 kW / 1,160 kWh battery would be installed. A phased approach could be used to install PV and additional BESS at the site when funding is available.

Next steps

The Clean Coalition recommends that LACCD take the following steps:

Consider an LACCD-wide portfolio approach. The high project costs of the emergency power systems for the ESC are driven by the site’s location in a dense downtown area. Project economics are expected to be much more favorable at other LACCD campuses – which typically have much more solar siting potential and more options for BESS siting, and which should be eligible for SGIP incentives.

Reduce critical loads. The IT servers and server cooling represent the largest single critical load component at the ESC site. IT server loads can be reduced by transferring server operations to a remote site during grid outages. This transfer could reduce the system size needed to serve the critical load or could enable longer durations of backup power.

Perform a sensitivity analysis of future LADWP TOU periods and rates. Currently, the LADWP peak TOU period for both energy and demand charges is 1-5pm. As penetrations of solar increase, it’s expected that LADWP will shift its peak TOU period to later in the evening, following similar changes made by Southern California Edison and the other California investor-owned utilities (IOUs). A sensitivity analysis comparing the future LADWP rate to a later TOU period will show potential energy and demand charge savings provided by PV+BESS compared to savings at the current TOU rate.

Continue the following discussions:

  • Discussions with the LA City Mayor’s Office on the feasibility of permitting a PV+BESS or BESS-only emergency power system; while approval will need to come from the LA City Building Inspection department, the Mayor’s Office is facilitating the discussion.
  • Discussions with the State Architect about whether a PV+BESS emergency power system is permissible for student-occupied buildings.
  • Discussions with LADWP about partnering on their required distributed energy resources planning, for which they will be installing generation and energy storage resources across the City.

In considering renewable-energy-based alternatives to what would otherwise simply be another dirty diesel generator, as well as engaging with the Mayor’s Office to hedge against future permitting issues and with LADWP to identify creative funding solutions, LACCD is showing real leadership.


Frank Wasko

Program Director

Frank brings to the Clean Coalition 30 years of service and experience from Southern California Edison (SCE) across a variety of functions, including field project management and field construction. In his last position at SCE, Frank served as Region Manager for government affairs. Frank also has a strong background in municipalization, infrastructure upgrade and improvement programs, rate optimization, and third-party interconnection.