FOM/WDG interconnection

Unleashing an underserved market

About FOM/WDG FOM Interconnection Case Study

Bringing more clean local energy to California

Wholesale distributed generation (WDG), also known as front-of-meter (FOM), is an underserved market segment in California. FOM projects bring communities unparalleled economic, environmental, and resilience benefits.

Interconnecting an FOM project to the grid in California can take years, and it can be arduous and expensive. Fixing the FOM interconnection process will result in significantly more clean local energy in the state.

Based on our experience in this area, the Clean Coalition produced a case study highlighting the alarming need to fix FOM interconnection in California — and the key policy innovations that make the fix easy.

+ Read the case study

Solar panels in the foreground with a modern city skyline under a cloudy sky in the background.

What is FOM?

A crucial market segment

FOM, or WDG, refers to distributed energy generation, often commercial-scale solar, that interconnects to the distribution grid in front of the meter and serves local loads while avoiding any use of the transmission grid. Rather than serving one customer, these systems can serve an entire community, while avoiding the expensive, inefficient transmission lines required by remote power generation. FOM projects provide these and many more benefits.

Learn more
Aerial view of a parking lot covered with solar panels, with cars parked in rows between the panels.

Why we need to fix FOM interconnection

Because of the current uncertainty and extra costs involved in interconnecting an FOM project to the grid in California — which can take years  —many projects never get off the ground. Many more are not even being considered. Fixing the FOM interconnection process will result in significantly more clean local energy in the state.

Learn more
Graphic overlay of mathematical and electrical engineering symbols on an image of utility poles and transformers.

Principles for reforming FOM interconnection

  • Transparency: Too often, interconnection information is hard to access. Developers, policymakers, and others must have full, easy access to interconnection studies, queues, costs, and grid maps.
  • Accountability: Utilities must adhere to clear and consistent rules and timelines.
  • Cost certainty: Developers must know, as early as possible, how much it will cost to connect a project to the grid.
  • Distributed generation priority: Local distributed generation projects should have priority over large, centralized power projects that rely on inefficient, expensive long-distance transmission.
  • Interconnection 3.0: With innovations in grid technology and interconnection processes, utilities will be able to run simple computer simulations to determine whether a new generation project can connect to the grid.
Aerial view of a residential area with rows of multi-story houses equipped with solar panels on the roofs.

FOM Interconnection Case Study

The Clean Coalition is leading the Valencia Gardens Energy Storage (VGES) Project. This groundbreaking project, located at a senior and low-income housing facility in the heart of San Francisco, will showcase how FOM energy storage can be effectively deployed in dense, developed urban environments. Based on our experience with this project, we produced an extensive case study highlighting the alarming need to fix FOM interconnection in California — and the key policy innovations that make the fix easy.

Read the case study
An electrical substation with transformers and high-voltage equipment under a clear blue sky.

WDG Interconnection Pilot

The WDG Interconnection Pilot has the goal of facilitating interconnection for FOM/WDG projects.

The pilot was established by the Peninsula Advanced Energy Community (PAEC) Initiative, which seeks to educate policymakers and stakeholders on beneficial reforms that will keep interconnection processes efficient and cost-effective while maintaining a safe and reliable electric grid.

View the pilot (PDF)

The trouble with FOM/WDG interconnection

The current interconnection process presents a significant problem that must be fixed if we are to unleash the FOM market segment — the market segment that Germany targeted, propelling the country to become a global clean energy leader.

Because of the uncertainty and extra costs of interconnecting an FOM project in California, many projects never get off the ground, and many more are never even considered. 

Compared to the process for identically sized and similarly sited net energy metering (NEM) projects in California, interconnecting FOM projects costs significantly more, takes longer, and is far less predictable.

Project type Average utility charges per project Average timeframe Cost predictability
NEM projects up to 1 MW $150 105 days Standardized flat fee
FOM projects up to 1 MW $150,000 137 days Individual costs, estimated case by case, and subject to post-contract revision

A significant roadblock for developers of FOM projects is the lack of predictability. Currently, for these projects it’s not possible to use publicly available information to determine impacts and costs prior to completing an application. The costs incurred prior to being able to submit an application vary widely, but they can typically exceed $50,000, with upgrades averaging $150,000 for a 1 MW project. This presents a major risk for developers.

Aerial view of a modern residential complex with numerous buildings covered in solar panels.
Rows of blue solar panels on a rooftop against a backdrop of urban buildings and a distant body of water.
Rows of solar panels installed on the roofs of urban buildings, capturing renewable energy from sunlight.
Solar panels and wind turbines in a field under a clear sky, with electricity pylons in the background.

 

Streamlining FOM interconnection

We have solutions now for streamlining FOM interconnection. Funded by a grant from the California Energy Commission (CEC) and led by the Clean Coalition, the Peninsula Advanced Energy Community (PAEC) Initiative studied the barriers to interconnection and presented recommendations for improvements.

Best practices for interconnection

In its report Best Practices: Interconnection for Local, Commercial-Scale, Renewable Energy Projects, the PAEC Initiative developed recommendations for streamlining interconnection.

Recommendations include:

  • Transparent application and review processes
  • Predictable and reasonable timelines
  • Enhanced queue management
  • Dispute resolution procedures
  • Clear cost-certainty measures

Interconnection pilot

The PAEC Initiative also designed a Pilot for Testing Streamlined Interconnection Procedures, which aims to replicate the streamlined NEM interconnection process, timing, and pricing for qualified WDG projects.

The pilot includes:

  • Published grid hosting capacity information to show what size of projects can be installed without grid upgrade costs. Supplying grid information supports optimized project proposals and reduces modifications, withdrawals, and applicant friction.
  • A standardized interconnection flat fee where upgrades are not required (based on average actual costs incurred by PG&E).
  • Timely scheduling and completion of site visits for physical inspection, interconnection, and any necessary adjustments on the utility grid.

In addition to streamlining the interconnection process for WDG projects, the pilot’s goals include:

  • Reducing staff time and cost for interconnection review
  • Encouraging or incentivizing project applications that deliver benefits such as mitigating local grid needs or constraints
A Solar Siting Survey conducted in the PAEC region identified over 65 MW of commercial-scale solar potential on rooftops, parking lots, and parking structures
High-voltage power lines and transmission towers silhouetted against a vivid sunset sky.

Rule 21

Electric Rule 21 is a tariff in California that describes the interconnection, operating, and metering requirements for generation facilities to be connected to a utility’s distribution system.

As the state with much of the earliest growth in distributed resources, California has identified state jurisdictional interconnection issues long before they have cropped up elsewhere. The state’s tariff and rules continue to serve as the foundation and model for other states’ regulations on interconnection.

The Clean Coalition has been a leading intervenor in and contributor to these efforts: developing new tariffs to accept FOM projects; publishing interconnection capacity analysis (ICA) maps, pre-application reports, unit cost guides, group study and guaranteed cost envelope options; and incorporating energy storage and advanced inverter standards.

Read about advanced inverters
A screenshot of a digital map with various colored lines indicating electrical distribution segments, accompanied by a detailed sidebar with location data and statistics.

Hosting or interconnection capacity analysis

Hosting capacity analysis (HCA), or interconnection capacity analysis (ICA), involves a proactive assessment of the existing distribution grid to understand which locations have the capacity to accommodate new DER, which makes interconnection of these resources quicker and cheaper. Grid maps, with details on available capacity down to the circuit level, are made publicly available and are regularly updated.

In California, the Clean Coalition has played a major role as a leading advocate for the state’s ICA maps, most recently updated to ICA 2.0 in December 2018.

Read about ICA 2.0

Learn more

Reports and case studies

Webinars

Regulatory filings

Media coverage

We adopt the Clean Coalition’s recommendation to require the IOUs to provide the ‘available capacity’ at the substation and circuit level, which we define as the total capacity minus the allocated and queued capacity.

California Public Utilities Commission
Decision 10-12-048, Renewables Auction Mechanism

Recent news

The latest in clean local energy

Learn about our innovative projects and initiatives on our blog, and see what others are reporting about our important work.

All news

Finding the Balance: Benchmarking Solar, Wind and Energy Storage Community Benefits Agreements

This blog post by the Clean Coalition details community benefits agreements for clean energy projects

Read More

Non-Energy Benefits and Social Costs: Properly Valuing Distributed Generation

This blog post from the Clean Coalition describes the importance of accounting for Non-Energy Benefits and Social Costs in Resource Planning.

Read More

Kapalama Container Terminal Electrification Plan: Showcasing Sustainable Port Operations

This blog post by the Clean Coalition details the Terminal Electrification Plan for Kapalama Container Terminal in Honolulu, Hawaii.

Read More
Copyright © 2023 Clean Coalition
Site Design: FIREANT STUDIO